« Old Train | Main | New Safari »

Monday, April 14, 2003

InDesign Rising

Daring Fireball examines the issue of Quark XPress vs Adobe InDesign today: The Sticky Business of Page Layout. He wonders why InDesign isn't catching on faster. I'll tell you why: inertia. Objects at rest tend to stay at rest until acted upon by another force.
Designers (anybody who puts stuff on a page) will stick with Quark mostly because it is familiar. Sadly, they will probably stay with Quark until they are forced to get InDesign due to company policy or migration to Mac OS X or continued delays in an OS X version of Quark. Let me tell you, though, many people in the industry are taking InDesign training to prepare themselves for the eventual switch. Those who already have are very pleased. Stop the stagnation and get yourself into InDesign today! Please. Don't worry about your service bureau or prepress shop -- if they want your business, they'll support InDesign files or they already do and you don't know it yet.


posted by jeremy at 09:10 AM | On This Day: 2002


visitor chattering

I think you're right on the mark with this one. Quark has taken a huge risk by deciding to plod ahead with their 9X revision as opposed to diving into OS X. Quark in Classic is incredibly wonky, at least for me. I've been putting off learning InDesign even though I have it as part of the Adobe suite. I need to get off the "stick" and try it out.

BTW, great blog Jeremy!

posted by: MJ on April 15, 2003 10:05 AM

Hopefully InDesign catches on soon. I use Quark as my primary layout program, but version 5 disgusted me so much for being such a let down that I am thinking about moving to Adobe. Besides InDesign incorporates a number of nifty visual techniques that came from Photoshop and Illustrator-things that Quark does not have.

posted by: Buddha on April 16, 2003 7:22 AM